It was called conspiracy theory right away, but the gains for RedHat are obvious: RedHat would be dumb not to try this.
#Quod libet plugins update#
Update (): An email to the mailing list of the technical committee of debian summarized the strategic implications of systemd-adoption for Debian and RedHat. It could be a good idea to start having community-paid developers.
Can we really assume that there won’t be intentional disruption? Maybe I should look for solutions. Others saw this trend 2 years before I even knew about systemd. Update (): And now we have Julian Assange warning about NSA control over Debian, Theodore Ts’o, maintainer of ext4, complaining about incomprehensible systemd, and Linus Torvalds (you know him, right?) rant against disrupting behavior from systemd developers, going as far as refusing to merge anything from the developers in question into Linux. Update (): boycott systemd calls for action with 12 reasons against systemd: “We do recognize the need for a new init system in the 21st century, but systemd is not it.” Update (): Lennart hetzt (german) describes the rhetoric tricks used by Lennart Poettering to make people forget that he is a major part of the communication problems we’re facing at times - and to hide valid technical, practical, pragmatical, political und strategical criticism of Systemd. It is linked under “Are there better solutions ?” on the site Shall we fork Debian™? :^|. Update (): There is now a vote on a General Resolution in Debian for preserving the ability to switch init systems. Ian Jackson resigned from the Technical Committee: “And, speaking personally, I am exhausted.” The vote page provides detailed results and statistics. Update (): The Debian General Resolution resulted in “We do not need a general resolution to decide systemd”. It shows that the attitude which forms the root of the dangers of systemd is even visible in its very source code. Update (): One more deconstruction of the strategies around systemd: systemd: Assumptions, Bullying, Consent. Use runit for process supervision of user-services and system-services alike. That’s simple and fast and full-featured with minimal fuss.
#Quod libet plugins how to#
And it is starting: How to crash systemd in one tweet? Alternatives? Use OpenRC for system services. And once it is active, only those who wrote it will be able to defuse it - and check whether it is defused. Update (): Systemd is an exploit kit just waiting to be activated. That’s one more better option than systemd. Update (2019): I now use GNU Guix with shepherd. Systemd is a new way to start a Linux-system with the expressed goal of rethinking all of init.
0 kommentar(er)
